Financial analysis for investment and policy - MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Financial analysis for investment and policy. Answer: Introduction The report aims to outline the core activities of and the market in which the company is seen to be operating. Some of the important concepts of the financial aspects of the discussion is seen with calculation of the key ratios, evaluating the information from ASX website, evaluation of WACC and calculating the rate of return. In addition to this, the learnings from the report has evaluated Rate of return for the companies shares, Amendments on gearing ratio and Working towards the maintenance of a preferred optimal capital structure. Brief description of the company Emmerson resources is considered as Australias one of the most eminent Tennant Creek mineral field holder. This field is characterised with the use of extremely high quality of gold gold-copper deposits. The company has produced in excess of 5.5 million ounces of gold and 488000 tonnes of copper. The main operations of the company are owned by Warrego Gold Plant which is located 35 kilometres north-west of Tennant Creek having an annual capacity of 300000 tonnes. Ownership-governance structure Substantial shareholders The two main shareholders of the company are identified with Evolution Mining Limited and J P Morgan Nominees Australia. Evolution Mining Limited constitutes of 49,144,000 shares having a total percentage of 12.92% and J P Morgan Nominees Australia constitutes of 45,236,446 shares having a total percentage of 11.89 %. The main people involved Andrew McIlwain is identified as the Non-Executive Chairman. Dr Allan Trench is considered to be important member of board of director. In addition to this, Robert Bills is the Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer. Calculation of Key Ratios Ratio Calculation Profitability Ratio Analysis: - Emmerson Resources Particulars 2017 2016 2015 2014 $ $ $ $ Net Profit/Loss (D) -3525346 -4095855 -837620 -4495664 Ordinary shareholders equity(H) 18787369 22263593 27217124 25226367 Total Assets (F) 19402991 22907474 28096921 25884137 Return on Equity (ROE) (A/H) -19% -18% -3.08% -17.82% Return on assets (ROA) (D/F) -0.182 -0.179 -0.030 -0.174 Solvency Ratio Analysis: - Emmerson Resources 2017 2016 2015 2014 Total Liabilities (D) 615622 643880 879797 657770 Total Assets (E) 19402991 22907474 28096921 25884137 Debt Equity Ratio (D/B) 0.032 0.028 0.031 0.025 (EBIT/ TA) x (NPAT/EBIT) x (TA/OE) = (NPAT)/(OE) (EBIT/ TA) x (NPAT/EBIT) x (TA/OE) = EBIT x NPAT/EBIT x 1/OE EBIT x (NPAT/EBIT) x (1/OE) = (NPAT)/(OE) TA/OE Impacting on the relationship between ROA and ROE As per the depiction of Dupont analysis ROE helps in the depiction of investors to gauge their investments and income generated from the same. On the other hand, ROA is conducive in measurement of how the investors are able to measure the assets and the resources to generate more income. A higher proportion of assets in compare to the shareholders equity shows the extent to which the company used the debt leverage for the capital structure. Rationale for ROE significantly greater than ROA As per the reducing trend of ROA, it needs to be understood that the company is carrying a significant portion of the debt. It needs to be further discerned that based on the evaluation of both ROE and ROA the company as the ROA is very low the ROE is also not al all favourable. Using the information from the ASX website Graph for movements in the monthly share price over the last two years Comparison of movements in the companies share price index As per the significant nature of the assertions of the share price index, it needs to be understood that the ERM has depicted a low market volatility in terms of the closing price of the shares when compares to closing price all ordinary index. Research via the internet or financial/business publications As per the recent assertations Emmerson commenced the exploration on new gold-copper projects in NSW which is identified with the strategic alliance as per Kenex Limited. In addition to this, the application of big multiple independent datasets considered the increased probability of the discovery through enhanced predictive capability. The five-exploration project is attributed with the known deposits which are within the scope of Macquarie Arc. However, these are considered with the several types of the historical impediments, including overlying cover (plus farm lands) and a lack of exploration focus. The only potential of the company is considered to be Kadungle and Aurelia Metals covering 43km2 which is close to Emmersons Fifield project. Capital Asset Pricing Model Calculated beta () for the company Calculation of Required Rate of Return and Beta Date Closing Price of ERM Percentage daily change of ERM Closing Price Of ^AORD Percentage change closing price of ^AORD 11/30/2017 0.083 6167.299805 10/31/2017 0.082 -1.205% 6023.5 -2.332% 9/30/2017 0.083 1.220% 5976.399902 -0.782% 8/31/2017 0.09 8.434% 5744.899902 -3.874% 7/31/2017 0.096 6.667% 5776.299805 0.547% 6/30/2017 0.11 14.583% 5773.899902 -0.042% 5/31/2017 0.1 -9.091% 5764 -0.171% 4/30/2017 0.09 -10.000% 5761.299805 -0.047% 3/31/2017 0.085 -5.556% 5947.600098 3.234% 2/28/2017 0.097 14.118% 5903.799805 -0.736% 1/31/2017 0.105 8.247% 5761 -2.419% 12/31/2016 0.12 14.286% 5675 -1.493% 11/30/2016 0.13 8.333% 5719.100098 0.777% 10/31/2016 0.14 7.692% 5502.399902 -3.789% 9/30/2016 0.165 17.857% 5402.399902 -1.817% 8/31/2016 0.15 -9.091% 5525.200195 2.273% 7/31/2016 0.12 -20.000% 5529.399902 0.076% 6/30/2016 0.085 -29.167% 5644 2.073% 5/31/2016 0.049 -42.353% 5310.399902 -5.911% 4/30/2016 0.056 14.286% 5447.799805 2.587% 3/31/2016 0.047 -16.071% 5316 -2.419% 2/29/2016 0.04 -14.894% 5151.799805 -3.089% 1/31/2016 0.035 -12.500% 4947.899902 -3.958% 12/31/2015 0.03 -14.286% 5056.600098 2.197% 11/30/2015 0.037 23.333% 5344.600098 5.696% 10/31/2015 0.04 8.108% 5218.200195 -2.365% 9/30/2015 0.054 35.000% 5288.600098 1.349% 8/31/2015 0.034 -37.037% 5058.600098 -4.349% 7/31/2015 0.032 -5.882% 5222.100098 3.232% 6/30/2015 0.032 0.000% 5681.700195 8.801% 5/31/2015 0.028 -12.500% 5451.200195 -4.057% 4/30/2015 0.03 7.143% 5774.899902 5.938% 3/31/2015 0.034 13.333% 5773.700195 -0.021% 2/28/2015 0.026 -23.529% 5861.899902 1.528% 1/31/2015 0.03 15.385% 5898.5 0.624% The Beta value is calculation in done with by covariance of Percentage daily change of ERM and ^AORD divided by the variance of Percentage daily change of ^AORD. The beta value is depicted to be 4.462. Rate of return for the companies shares a 4.462 Risk Free Rate (Rf) 4.00% Expected market return of Emmerson Resources (Rm1) 6.00% Required rate of return 12.924% Rationale for conservative investment Despite of having a high rate of return (12.924%) in compare to the risk-free rate of 4% and excepted market rate of 6%, the investment decision needs to considered with several other factors. This is mainly depicted with consecutive looses accounted in the last four years and decreasing trend of return on equity. The high Beta of 4.462 shows the company is more prone to fluctuate with the share price index. Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) WACC Calculation Re Cost of equity Rd Cost of debt Equity Market value of the firms equity Debt Market value of the firms debt E/V Percentage of financing that is equity D/V Percentage of financing that is debt TC Corporate tax rate Re 13% Rd 6% Equity 18787369 Debt 2730372 E/V 0.873111 D/V 0.126889342 TC 30% WACC 11.82% Managements evaluation of WACC A high weighted average cost of capital is a significant factor for high risk related to the operations of the firm. The investors need additional return for the consideration of higher risk. The WACC evaluation can be used to estimate t5he expected costs required to finance its resources. This particular shows that the company has more debt obligations, cost of debt and lower cost of equity. Debt Ratio of the Company over the past two years Working towards the maintenance of a preferred optimal capital structure Based on the calculation of the solvency ratio for the past four years it has been seen that the company is having a debt equity ratio of 0.025 in 2014, 0.031 in 2015, 0.028 in 2016 and 0.032 in 2017. Due to such fluctuating trend of the debt equity ratio, the company is not maintaining to lower its net debt. Henceforth, it is not proceeding towards a preferred optimal capital structure. Amendments on gearing ratio As per the amendment of the annual report there is not significance of gearing ratio. The company is able to reduce the total borrowing from $ 643,880 to $ 615,622. The company has further issued 0.26% of the Holdings less than a marketable parcel of shares. Dividend Policy The interpretations made in the annual report has been able to depict that the company used to follow constant dividend per share, however no dividends were paid or declared by the Company since the end of the previous financial year. Letter of recommendation to the client Dear XYZ, NSW Australia Dear Sir/Madam, We are delighted to provide you with our recommendation for investment as per the evaluation of financial statement of the last four year. Despite unfavourable performance in areas pertaining to ROE, ROA and Debt equity ratios. There is significant scope of improvement as per the rate of return from the stock price. In addition to this, the initiatives taken by the company has ensured that it is able to reduce the overall obligations for the borrowings. Emmerson commenced the exploration on new gold-copper projects in NSW which is identified with the strategic alliance as per Kenex Limited. In addition to this, the application of big multiple independent datasets considered the increased probability of the discovery through enhanced predictive capability. The five-exploration project is attributed with the known deposits which are within the scope of Macquarie Arc. This shows that the company is having significant scope for the improving in other areas in future. The two main shareho lders of the company are identified with Evolution Mining Limited and J P Morgan Nominees Australia are further discerned to having significant scope of improvement for developing the future prospect of the company. Conclusion The findings of the report have shown that the in terms of both Return on Equity (ROE) and Return on assets (ROA) the company has been able to depict a reducing trend. The depiction of the debt equity ratio has also been evident with a negative trend. Moreover, the two main shareholders Evolution Mining Limited constitutes of 49,144,000 shares having a total percentage of 12.92% and J P Morgan Nominees Australia constitutes of 45,236,446 shares having a total percentage of 11.89 %. Despite of the unfavourable performance for ROE, ROA and Debt equity ratios. There is significant scope of improvement as per the rate of return from the high rate of return of 13%. In addition to this, the initiatives taken by the company has ensured that it is able to reduce the overall obligations for the borrowings. Emmerson commenced the exploration on new gold-copper projects in NSW which is identified with the strategic alliance as per Kenex Limited. In addition to this, the application of big multi ple independent datasets considered the increased probability of the discovery through enhanced predictive capability. Bibliography Cucchiella, F. and Rosa, P., 2015. End-of-Life of used photovoltaic modules: A financial analysis.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,47, pp.552-561. Cucchiella, F., DAdamo, I. and Gastaldi, M., 2015. Financial analysis for investment and policy decisions in the renewable energy sector.Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy,17(4), pp.887-904. Dewachter, H., Iania, L., Lyrio, M. and de Sola Perea, M., 2015. A macro-financial analysis of the euro area sovereign bond market.Journal of Banking Finance,50, pp.308-325. Kallala, R.F., Vanhegan, I.S., Ibrahim, M.S., Sarmah, S. and Haddad, F.S., 2015. Financial analysis of revision knee surgery based on NHS tariffs and hospital costs.Bone Joint J,97(2), pp.197-201. Rigamonti, L., Ferreira, S., Grosso, M. and Marques, R.C., 2015. Economic-financial analysis of the Italian packaging waste management system from a local authority's perspective.Journal of Cleaner Production,87, pp.533-541. Shouman, E.R., El Shenawy, E.T. and Khattab, N.M., 2016. Market financial analysis and cost performance for photovoltaic technology through international and national perspective with case study for Egypt.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,57, pp.540-549. Stone, A.B., Grant, M.C., Roda, C.P., Hobson, D., Pawlik, T., Wu, C.L. and Wick, E.C., 2016. Implementation costs of an enhanced recovery after surgery program in the United States: a financial model and sensitivity analysis based on experiences at a quaternary academic medical center.Journal of the American College of Surgeons,222(3), pp.219-225. Vogel, H.L., 2014.Entertainment industry economics: A guide for financial analysis. Cambridge University Press. Yoder, J.R., Alexander, C., Ivanic, R., Rosch, S., Tyner, W. and Wu, S.Y., 2015. Risk versus reward, a financial analysis of alternative contract specifications for the miscanthus lignocellulosic supply chain.BioEnergy Research,8(2), pp.644-656.